http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/vocabularies/introvocabs/
Importance of documenting art and material culture:
Contextual Information – pictures cannot speak for themselves, give factual information about the maker, context etc.
TEN POINTS of Focus
1. Opening new worlds to new audiences – broadening interests
2. Telling a story – giving narrative and meaning
3. Being multidisciplinary – reaching out to a wider audience
4. Being international – reach even further and gaining new perspectives
5. Focusing on an “act of creation” – where does the piece come from
6. Resource for education and entertainment – visual material as a learning tool vs. commodity
7. Having a point of view – subjectivity as a forum for establishing context
8. Recording by a variety of media – pooling information from different sources for richer context
9. Scientific analysis or quantification – only if you really have to…
10. Art information is complex – it helps to understand the language!
Four major approaches to documentation of art and material culture have evolved over time: archival, library, museum, and visual resources.
The archival approach involves the arrangement and description of records, personal papers, and manuscripts. Access, in-hand, groups of objects
The library approach involves the cataloging and classification of books and other published textual materials. This tradition is also known as bibliographic cataloging and classification. In-hand, individual objects, subject access, data sharing.
The museum approach involves the documentation of museum objects (e.g., works of art, artifacts, and specimens). Complex, unique objects, progressive in giving internet access to artifacts.
The Visual Resources approach involves the cataloging, classification, and indexing of images. Giving access to visual information, adopting the museum model of image as object, non-standardized classification systems.
STANDARDS
“represent professional consensus on best practice. The process that produces standards typically brings together knowledgeable practitioners to codify a reasonable body of practice based on a wide range of experiences.”
There are four types of data standards designed to improve access to your information.
1. Data Structure Standards define the categories into which information is to be divided.
ex. CDWA http://www.getty.edu/research/conducting_research/standards/cdwa/
2. Data Communication Standards – the language used by a data structure system.
Ex. MARC
3. Data Content Standards are guidelines that govern the order, syntax, and form in which the data values are entered into the structure categories.
4. Data Value Standards control the vocabulary in the data structure fields.
All of these are important to preserve the integrity of information, provide access by establishing quality, consistency and compatibility.

